Match analytics

Yannick Hanfmann vs Jakub Mensik · Match odds & ELO prediction

Munich • Clay • Apr 15, 2025 • 9:05 AM

Clay

Final score

2 - 1

Winner Yannick Hanfmann

Key insights

Player performance profile

Yannick Hanfmann

HARDSmall sample

0% · 01 on hard

Games won (last 10)

55%

10 matches tracked

Player Skillset

Based on ~8,518 points across 58 matches

Serve strengthServe strength (Player serve win % - tour average serve win %) scaled by sample size
Strong
2.680% Pctl
Return strengthReturn strength (Player return win % - tour average return win %) scaled by sample size
Strong
-0.476% Pctl
Pressure IndexPressure Index (Break point performance - baseline point performance) with a small adjustment for tiebreak results
Vulnerable
-5.69% Pctl
Tiebreak win %
Shaky
43%30% Pctl

Percentiles compare against tour-level players in TennisTrove.

Jakub Mensik

HARDSmall sample

33% · 12 on hard

Games won (last 10)

51%

10 matches tracked

Player Skillset

Based on ~10,043 points across 59 matches

Serve strengthServe strength (Player serve win % - tour average serve win %) scaled by sample size
Strong
3.187% Pctl
Return strengthReturn strength (Player return win % - tour average return win %) scaled by sample size
Solid
-1.657% Pctl
Pressure IndexPressure Index (Break point performance - baseline point performance) with a small adjustment for tiebreak results
Solid
+0.958% Pctl
Tiebreak win %
Solid
58%69% Pctl

Percentiles compare against tour-level players in TennisTrove.

Match Overview

Yannick Hanfmann and Jakub Mensik are set to meet at the Munich on April 15, 2025 in a clay-court singles match. Hanfmann enters with a 17–12 record on clay courts in 2025, while Mensik has posted a 6–5 mark on clay courts this season. Elo ratings point to a clear statistical advantage for Mensik entering this matchup. In their head-to-head history, Hanfmann leads 3–1 over Mensik, including a win in their most recent meeting.

Recent singles form slightly favors Mensik, who has won 5 of his last five matches, while Hanfmann has gone 2–3 over the same span.