Match analytics

Nick Hardt vs Ivan Gakhov · Match odds & ELO prediction

M25 Zaragoza • Clay • Oct 2, 2025 • 3:40 PM

Clay

Final score

0 - 2

Winner Ivan Gakhov

Key insights

Player performance profile

Nick Hardt

HARDSmall sample

25% · 13 on hard

CLAY

59% · 2316 on clay

Games won (last 10)

62%

10 matches tracked

Player Skillset

Based on ~0 points across 0 matches

Serve strengthServe strength (Player serve win % - tour average serve win %) scaled by sample size
Shaky
0.037% Pctl
Return strengthReturn strength (Player return win % - tour average return win %) scaled by sample size
Strong
0.081% Pctl
Pressure IndexPressure Index (Break point performance - baseline point performance) with a small adjustment for tiebreak results
Shaky
0.048% Pctl
Tiebreak win %
Insufficient data

Percentiles compare against tour-level players in TennisTrove.

Ivan Gakhov

HARD

53% · 87 on hard

CLAY

61% · 4630 on clay

Games won (last 10)

49%

10 matches tracked

Player Skillset

Based on ~389 points across 2 matches

Serve strengthServe strength (Player serve win % - tour average serve win %) scaled by sample size
Shaky
-0.333% Pctl
Return strengthReturn strength (Player return win % - tour average return win %) scaled by sample size
Solid
-0.871% Pctl
Pressure IndexPressure Index (Break point performance - baseline point performance) with a small adjustment for tiebreak results
Strong
+4.283% Pctl
Tiebreak win %
Insufficient data

Percentiles compare against tour-level players in TennisTrove.

Match Overview

Nick Hardt and Ivan Gakhov are set to meet at the M25 Zaragoza on October 2, 2025 in a clay-court singles match. Hardt enters with a 23–16 record on clay courts in 2025, while Gakhov has posted a 46–30 mark on clay courts this season. Elo ratings suggest a modest statistical edge for Gakhov, but the gap is not overwhelming. In their head-to-head history, Hardt leads 4–2 over Gakhov.

Recent form has been mixed for both players, with Hardt and Gakhov alternating wins and losses across their last few singles outings.