BUILD_STAMP:fix1-no-premium-endpoint-2026-03-05
Match analytics

Martin Damm vs Chris Rodesch · Match odds & ELO prediction

Canberra • Hard • Jan 5, 2026 • 5:00 AM

Hard

Final score

0 - 2

Winner Chris Rodesch

Key insights

Player performance profile

Martin Damm

HARDSmall sample

50% · 11 on hard

Games won (last 10)

57%

10 matches tracked

Player Skillset

Based on ~1,564 points across 9 matches

Serve strengthServe strength (Player serve win % - tour average serve win %) scaled by sample size
Elite
5.798% Pctl
Return strengthReturn strength (Player return win % - tour average return win %) scaled by sample size
Vulnerable
-5.16% Pctl
Pressure IndexPressure Index (Break point performance - baseline point performance) with a small adjustment for tiebreak results
Solid
+0.957% Pctl
Tiebreak win %
Strong
67%89% Pctl

Percentiles compare against tour-level players in TennisTrove.

Chris Rodesch

HARDSmall sample

75% · 31 on hard

Games won (last 10)

62%

10 matches tracked

Player Skillset

Based on ~823 points across 7 matches

Serve strengthServe strength (Player serve win % - tour average serve win %) scaled by sample size
Solid
2.375% Pctl
Return strengthReturn strength (Player return win % - tour average return win %) scaled by sample size
Shaky
-2.048% Pctl
Pressure IndexPressure Index (Break point performance - baseline point performance) with a small adjustment for tiebreak results
Strong
+4.986% Pctl
Tiebreak win %
Insufficient data

Percentiles compare against tour-level players in TennisTrove.

Match Overview

Martin Damm and Chris Rodesch are set to meet at the Canberra on January 5, 2026 in a hard-court singles match. Damm enters with a 1–1 record on hard courts in 2026, while Rodesch has posted a 3–1 mark on hard courts this season. Elo ratings point to a clear statistical advantage for Damm entering this matchup. In their head-to-head history, Rodesch leads 2–0 over Damm, including a win in their most recent meeting.

Recent singles form slightly favors Rodesch, who has won 5 of his last five matches, while Damm has gone 2–3 over the same span.
Loading value signal…