Match analytics

Eri Hozumi vs Jamie Loeb · Match odds & ELO prediction

Charleston • Clay • Mar 30, 2025 • 7:20 PM

Clay

Final score

1 - 2

Winner Jamie Loeb

Key insights

Player performance profile

Eri Hozumi

HARDSmall sample

50% · 11 on hard

CLAYSmall sample

0% · 01 on clay

Games won (last 10)

42%

3 matches tracked · limited sample

Player Skillset

Based on ~403 points across 2 matches

Serve strengthServe strength (Player serve win % - tour average serve win %) scaled by sample size
Shaky
-0.536% Pctl
Return strengthReturn strength (Player return win % - tour average return win %) scaled by sample size
Shaky
-1.236% Pctl
Pressure IndexPressure Index (Break point performance - baseline point performance) with a small adjustment for tiebreak results
Elite
+7.592% Pctl
Tiebreak win %
Insufficient data

Percentiles compare against tour-level players in TennisTrove.

Jamie Loeb

HARD

38% · 35 on hard

CLAY

50% · 88 on clay

Games won (last 10)

50%

6 matches tracked

Player Skillset

Based on ~302 points across 2 matches

Serve strengthServe strength (Player serve win % - tour average serve win %) scaled by sample size
Solid
1.163% Pctl
Return strengthReturn strength (Player return win % - tour average return win %) scaled by sample size
Elite
2.796% Pctl
Pressure IndexPressure Index (Break point performance - baseline point performance) with a small adjustment for tiebreak results
Vulnerable
-4.817% Pctl
Tiebreak win %
Insufficient data

Percentiles compare against tour-level players in TennisTrove.

Match Overview

Eri Hozumi and Jamie Loeb are set to meet at the Charleston on March 30, 2025 in a clay-court singles match. Hozumi enters with a 0–1 record on clay courts in 2025, while Loeb has posted a 8–8 mark on clay courts this season. Elo ratings suggest a modest statistical edge for Loeb, but the gap is not overwhelming. In their head-to-head history, Loeb leads 1–0 over Hozumi, including a win in their most recent meeting.

In terms of recent singles results, Loeb has gone 2–3 over his last 5 matches, while data for Hozumi is more limited.